Italian Open End Mutual Fund Costs

Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches

The most commonly used measures for evaluating the competing mutual funds are “Treynor Ratio”, “Sharpe Ratio” and “Jensen’s Alpha”. One also uses another measure called the “Information Ratio”. However, it is not clear which measure is the most robust. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the performance of mutual funds under the broad framework of Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis approach ...

Mutual fund performance, management behavior, and investor costs

We examine pure no-load funds over a 5-year period. For equity funds, trading activity is negatively related to returns. Expense ratios are not significantly related to returns. Potential capital gains exposure and tax cost ratio are positively related to return. For fixed income funds, trading activity is positively related to return. Expense ratios and tax cost ratios are negatively related t...

The MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY

Mutual Fund Objective Misclassification∗

Mutual funds are usually classified based on their stated objectives. If the stated objectives are not the actual objectives the funds pursue, conclusions drawn by investors and researchers based on the stated objectives will be misleading. This study classifies funds based on their attributes (characteristics, investment style, and risk/return measures). We find that the stated objectives of m...

Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

We study standard mutual fund performance measures, using simulated funds whose characteristics mimic actual funds. We find that performance measures used in previous mutual fund research have little ability to detect economically large magnitudes ~e.g., three percent per year! of abnormal fund performance, particularly if a fund’s style characteristics differ from those of the value-weighted m...